Sunday, 11 October 2009

The Quickening Maze


Of the 2009 Man Booker contenders, The Quickening Maze by Adam Foulds was the book that I anticipated the most and I left reading it until last. The blending of fact with fiction and the literary appropriation of history excited me; although historical novels were a recurring feature on this year's Booker lists, The Quickening Maze was the one that initially appealed.

Based on real events in Epping Forest on the edge of London around 1840, The Quickening Maze centres on the first incarceration of the great nature poet John Clare. After years struggling with alcohol, critical neglect and depression, Clare finds himself in High Beach Private Asylum - an institution run on reformist principles which would later become known as occupational therapy. At the same time another poet, the young Alfred Tennyson, moves nearby and becomes entangled in the life and catastrophic schemes of the asylum's owner, the peculiar, charismatic Dr Matthew Allen. [from dust-jacket]

I knew little of Tennyson and even less of Clare before reading. This is a creative and deft exploration of madness. In nineteenth century Epping Forest, the lives of the great poets are imaginatively vividly rendered and Clare's insanity most of all. Rewriting the poems of Byron whilst in the asylum, Clare -in the novel- believed he was Byron and in his mind's decline confused his child love, Mary, whom he hallucinated, with the many Marys that Byron loved.

Foulds is a poet himself but I never found the prose overly-poetic; beautiful words, yes, but accessible, simple, and a demonstrable love-affair with language. Structured through seven seasons with short vignettes and shifting narratives, the novel is very accomplished but I was never fully engaged; I enjoyed the novel but I wasn't captivated. The characters, although interesting, didn't gel for me. The Quickening Maze is a very subtle novel that intelligently blurs the lines between fact and fiction; it is beautifully written and crafted but some of its genius and strong themes could easily be missed in its gentle style. Its power though lies in the raw and intense evocation of the peasant poet's descent into madness and the other characters movement into futility and hopelessness. For fans of Clare and Tennyson and of course those of beautiful prose then this will be a flawless and enjoyable read but for those of us who enjoy compelling narrative and characters, this is somewhat lacking.

[Tennyson upon being asked his opinion of Byron's poetry] 'I remember when he died. I was a lad. I walked out into the woods full of distress at the news. It was the thought of all he hadn't yet written, all bright inside him, being lost for ever, lowered into darkness for eternity. I was most gloomy and despondent. I scratched his name onto a rock, a sandstone rock. It must still be there, I should think.'

The wind separated into thumps, into wing beats. An angel. An angel there in front of her. Tears fell like petals from her face. It stopped in front of her. Settling, its wings made a chittering sound. It paced back and forth, a strange, soft, curving walk that was almost like dancing. It reached out with its beautiful hands to steady itself in the mortal world, touching leaves, touching branches, and left stains of brightness where it touched.

She lay in her open grave, miles down, with the sharp voices of the places like dim clouds far above. She lay as still as she could. Her heart kept up its hateful slow tread in her chest. Warm tears that gave no relief now and then rolled into her ears, stopped, started again.


Saturday, 10 October 2009

The Beige Shelf



The beige shelf is just for fun; I noticed that I possessed a number of beige and cream books in my collection and I thought it would be interesting to see how effective they were en masse.

Penguin seem particularly inclined to use this shade for their books, single editions as well as the inexpensive classics and the Shakespeare series. Virago apparently like to employ a range of rainbow colours in for their covers, which explains why I have a couple of Viragoes on each rainbow shelf so far (well, that and the fact that I love Virago titles). On this shelf there is also the obligatory Angela Carter novels (this time edited by her); a seminal piece of feminist fiction, Fear of Flying by Erica Jong; some more drama (Irish as opposed to Shakespearean); a beloved Children's literature classic; and a good selection of modern literary fiction including works by two of my favourite writers, Gabriel Garcia Marquez and Salman Rushdie. I also have to make special mention of one of my best reads this year: The Lost Art of Keeping Secrets by Eva Rice; I read a library copy but managed to pick up a pristine copy for a very good price in a remainders shop a couple of months ago.

Does this shelf pop for you, do you find it striking or altogether too beige?


Friday, 9 October 2009

Round About a Pound a Week


In my wrap-up post for Persephone Reading Week, I mentioned that one of a number of Persephone Books that I subsequently wanted to read was Round About a Pound a Week by Maud Pember Reeves. Reading reviews written by Verity and Swati inspired me to read a title from the catalogue that hadn't previously appealed. I usually don't read much nonfiction, mostly because of a preference for fiction and also a fear that it will read as dry and specialised. I am, however, making a conscious effort to read more nonfiction and as one of my book groups reads an equal proportion of nonfiction to fiction, I decided to suggest Round About a Pound a Week when my choice of book to read came around for this month.

A Fabian Woman's study of forty two low-income families in Lambeth, South London, between 1909 and 1913, Round About a Pound a Week, is an illuminating historical document of working-class families (with the husband the sole breadwinner) who lived below the poverty line. To say that their poverty was abject by today's standards would be accurate although reading it one had to think how difficult it was for those families in the slums who had no income at all, let alone a low one; to say that conditions were stark for the families studied is an understatement. The findings of the study were that "round about a pound" a week was what these families had to live on and once that extends to rent, fuel, and food there isn't much -if anything- left for health-care, clothes, and luxuries (and their luxury items were items such as milk and sugar that we take for granted let alone alcohol, books and any other form of escapism/entertainment). Often these families had no space for more than one bed each for adults and children (large families being abundant in low-income households) let alone space for a board-game or a book; forms of entertainment were in little supply and it is observed in the reading that large families and lack of entertainment may correlate (also the requirement of additional heat).

The stark reality of how the working-classes lived during the early twentieth century is eye-opening. One hundred years on things are far improved although there are still so many families in the UK living below the poverty line and a distinct class system still exists. At least we now have a free health-care system and a drastically lower infant mortality rate. Many accounts of the loss of babies in the families studied were poignant and shocking. Families were also proud and paid funeral insurance each week to ensure that they did not endure the shame of a pauper's funeral for their dead child. One family's dead baby was buried in a family grave including seven other coffins of varying sizes; images such as this one proves why Round About a Pound a Week made such an impact upon publication.

Reading this historical study provided me with more of an insight into the period, an insight that had recently been widened by reading The Children's Book by A.S. Byatt. Although I was not a fan of Byatt's book as a novel, I can recognise its sheer scope in historical detail. Two of the poor characters from her large cast, Peter and Elsie, came from a low-income family where they shared a bed with their other siblings including a dead one as there was nowhere else to keep the body before the funeral. It was detail like this that remained with me from an otherwise negative reading experience and this detail was heightened by reading Round About a Pound a Week and the interesting, shocking, and poignant life stories. The Fabian study went a long way to influencing Liberal reforms and a century later we have to appreciate how lucky we are, even in an uncertain economic climate.


Thursday, 8 October 2009

We Have Always Lived in the Castle



My name is Mary Katherine Blackwood. I am eighteen years old, and I live with my sister Constance. I have often thought that with any luck at all I could have been born a werewolf, because the two middle fingers on both my hands are the same length, but I have had to be content with what I had. I dislike washing myself, and dogs, and noise. I like my sister Constance, and Richard Plantagenet, and
Amanita phalloides, the death-cup mushroom. Everyone else in my family is dead.

I was entranced from this opening line of We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson and was immediately immersed in the mystery and suspense. Mary Katherine/Merricat Blackwood is a fascinating narrator; at once endearing, unreliable, curious, and most definitely memorable. I felt similarly reading this short novel -only 146 pages- as I did whilst reading Jackson's short story "The Lottery" back in June: uneasy. Jackson masterfully builds the sense of unease into an unbearable tension in this incredibly atmospheric and creepy tale.

Merricat, her sister Constance, and confused Uncle Julian live a reclusive life on the Blackwood land outside the village. The villagers are cruel to the Blackwoods and their hatred runs deep; their cruelty is described in Merricat's last visit to the village for provisions and library books but the reason behind their vitriolic and vehement dislike of the family is not revealed until the third chapter. The village children taunt Merricat with the rhyme "Merricat, said Connie, would you like a cup of tea? Oh no, said Merricat, you'll poison me" but Constance is presented as lovely and gentle and the sisters are exceptionally close; the bonds of familial and sibling loyalty and affection run deep in this novel.

We Have Always Lived in the Castle is sinister and disturbing yet highly enjoyable. Merricat's narrative is exceptionally compelling and her novel outlook on the world is interminable in its uniqueness. I have said little of the plot but that is intentional; suffice to say that we discover how everyone else from the Blackwood family -mentioned in the opening paragraph- died. The suspenseful plot is very intriguing and it is best going into the novel knowing as little as possible to feel the full effects of the suspense built and to appreciate Jackson's craft. The events in the novel are claustrophobic and may be credited to Jackson's own agoraphobia. If you do feel persuaded to enter this wonderful story then please refrain from reading the back cover synopsis of the Penguin re-issued edition photographed above as it reveals the first secret, the revelation of which is built up to, and the true power of this is lost.

This is my second book read for the R.I.P. IV challenge and a thoroughly fitting one at that.

Wednesday, 7 October 2009

The Man Booker Prize 2009


The winner for the Man Booker Prize 2009 was announced earlier tonight/last night. The winner is Wolf Hall by Hilary Mantel.

My official statement yesterday (on other people's blogs and social networking sites) in reply to who I wanted to win was "my heart says Mawer; my head says Coetzee; either would make me happy but the former richer. I will possibly cry and throw things if Byatt wins because that was possibly the most turgid reading experience that I have had all year."

I have read 5/6 of the shortlisted novels so far. I have yet to read Wolf Hall by Hilary Mantel and of course the one I have yet to read is the one to win! My review of The Quickening Maze by Adam Foulds will follow later this week. I read 10/13 of the longlist and, for the most part, consider it a rewarding experience. My time and interest have been invested in this year's prize and I am thankful for some of the great books that it introduced me to whilst others I had discovered myself and through fellow bloggers before the longlist was announced.

I have intensely followed this year's prize and I am grateful that my present circumstances allowed me the time to devote to it. In preparation for the award last night I watched Friday October 2nd's episode of Newsnight Revew on BBC iplayer as it was devoted to discussion of the Booker contenders; if you do have access to iplayer then try to watch it if you can as the discussion of these titles is interesting, especially in the differing impressions that they evoke in the panel and the viewer. They called Mantel or Byatt to win even though their opinion of the Byatt wasn't always favourable and quite resembled mine at times; some of the few negative comments about the Mantel could have been applied to Byatt in my mind (chunkster in need of a good edit).

It was interesting that the one from the shortlist that they thought a "page-turner" -The Glass Room- is the one they thought didn't have a chance of winning. Despite it being second popular favourite at the bookmakers and mine for the reasons that it engaged me and I actually cared about the characters and thought the narrative was propelled by plot and the language and descriptions of the house and fluid architecture were sumptuous, it didn't win the critics' vote (nor that of the Booker judges). Is it curious that the winning novel is not one that you cannot put down but one that you have to read slowly to apparently appreciate was their one of two contenders for the prize; a contender that ended up losing to the other chunkster on the list.

I have the utmost respect for the judges who read the contenders three times each and imagine that they did discover new attributes and failures in them all but if I never read The Children's Book again it will be too soon; I'm relieved it didn't win as I was very reluctant to break any of my possessions and didn't have my own copy of the novel (thankful for small mercies) to throw out of the window into upcoming traffic. I will eventually read Wolf Hall but currently I am still fifth in line at the library.




Tuesday, 6 October 2009

Paperback_Reader Meets...





... William Shakespeare and Oscar Wilde!

Teaser Tuesdays


Quote a couple of spoiler-free sentences from the book you’re reading to tempt others.

"She would collect him shortly to accompany her across the garden to the doctor's house for breakfast, him having been a good lad.
He lifted the blanket, swung his softening white feet onto the clean wood floor, and stood up, and immediately wanted to lie back down again and not lie back down again and go and not go anywhere and not be there and be home."
The Quickening Maze by Adam Foulds p. 14-15

A Man Booker shortlisted title teaser today in honour of the Man Booker awards night later.